Converting a military tank for 90° vertical firing
Complete technical study: torque calculations by angle, hydraulic cylinder sizing, manual transmission, costs and real feasibility — with interactive calculators and animations.
Important preamble
No real main battle tank is designed to fire at 90°. Modern MBTs (Leopard 2, M1 Abrams, T-90…) are limited to about +20° to +42°. A 90° conversion is an experimental / demonstrator project, not a standard military modification.
0 N·m
Max gross torque (at 0°)
120 mm cannon ≈ 1,800 kg
0 N·m
Residual torque (92% counterweight)
~92% reduction
0 N
Required cylinder force
≈ 432 kgf — 0.6 m arm
0:1
Transmission ratio
2 gear stages
◆ Tactical advantages of vertical fire
Why a cannon capable of reaching 90° elevation unlocks unprecedented capabilities on the battlefield.
Anti-aircraft defense
A 90° cannon can engage low-altitude aircraft — attack helicopters, diving planes, loitering munitions — where a standard tank (limited to ~20°) is helpless. The large caliber (120 mm) compensates for aiming difficulty with a wide lethal radius.
Counter-drone capability (C-UAS)
FPV drones and teleoperated munitions typically attack in a vertical dive. Maximum elevation provides a direct-fire capability against these threats that conventional onboard systems cannot engage.
Urban warfare — high-angle engagement
In urban zones, threats emerge from upper floors, rooftops, and terraces. 90° elevation allows engaging these positions without exposing the vehicle, where a standard tank must reverse to find an angle.
Mountain warfare
In steep terrain, enemy positions are often above. Vertical fire engages ridge or cliff targets at a direct angle, without costly flanking maneuvers that waste time and lives.
Indirect mortar-like fire
At 90° (or near), the projectile follows a near-vertical trajectory: falling almost straight down on the target, like a heavy 120 mm mortar. Useful for reaching positions behind cover, trenches, or fortifications.
Deterrent effect & versatility
A single vehicle combines direct fire (0–20°) and anti-aircraft / indirect fire (20–90°). This versatility reduces the need for specialized units (SPAAG, mortars) and complicates enemy planning.
Explore the dossier
Context & Feasibility
Why 90° is a challenge
Physical calculations
Torque, forces, angles
Hydraulic cylinder
Sizing and pressure
Manual transmission
Crank and gear train
Ballistics
Firing trajectories
Technical diagrams
Trunnion, gears, cylinder, forces
Estimated costs
Prototype / demonstrator budget
Conversion timeline
Schedule ≈ 4 to 8 weeks
Maneuverability impact
Center of gravity, recoil, stability
Upgrades
Motorization, electronics, sensors…
References
Scientific foundations